Is there anything of which one could say, "Look! This is something
new?" Hardly! "What has been will be again;... there is nothing new under
the sun," Ecclesiastes 1: 9, 10.
This is certainly true of religious pluralism. There have been and still
are numerous systems of worship. These religions -- both ancient and modern
-- possess tremendous significance as life-determining and
community-governing forces. They cannot be ignored.
Religious pluralism is not a distant phenomenon. Adherents of
non-Christian religions are found throughout the world. They are our
neighbors. They use the same banks, shop at the same stores, eat in the same
restaurants, and drive on the same streets. What, then, is the difference
between them and us? They attend their temples and worship their gods, while
we assemble at church and praise Jehovah God.
This leads to the second question: are non-Christians lost? Examining
the deeper elements of their religion, entering into the experiences of their
poets, philosophers, theologians, prophets, and priests brings one face to face
with the noblest expressions of spirituality found anywhere. Has God
disclosed Himself to them? Is not Christ the Lord of history who at no time
and in no place has left Himself without a witness, John 1: 9; Acts 14: 17;
Romans 1: 18-20; 2: 7, 10, 14, 15? Does the Holy Spirit work in non-Christian
religions? Does not the Lord operate through historical processes so that in
the fullness of time He might gather together into one all things in Him,
Ephesians 1: 10?
These questions cannot be dismissed lightly. They challenge the very
foundation of mission, the integrity of Christ, the heart of the Gospel. A
thoughtfully worded reply is demanded. To facilitate such an answer, three
items will be discussed: commonality among religions, claims of Christianity,
and contemporary theories regarding religious pluralism.
A. All Religions Contain Ritual Practices. In writing about the
commonality between Christian and non-Christian religions, J. H. Bavinck
said,
B. All Religions Serve Specific Purposes. Religions have meaning
because they make sense out of the nonsense of life. They are maps of the
invisible world, a guide for living, an anchor within society. They ask and
answer questions about ultimate reality and immediate need. All religions
suggest ways of dealing with the tensions of life (Carmody and Carmody 1988:
3). They address the chaotic complexities of human existence, set priorities,
and help adherents survive threatening situations. People expect their
religion to offer answers, to produce results, to perform a benevolent service.
C. All Religions Possess Discernible Structures. Just as there is no
unstructured society, so there is no unstructured religion. Instead, certain
foundational features are found in all faiths (Ellwood 1992: 20).
D. All Religions Involve Spiritual Experiences. No religion can survive
as a mere doctrinal system, ethical code, or ritual practice. Religion must
reach into the soul with a deep and lasting impact. Without some kind of
spiritual experience, religion would be empty, lifeless, and unnecessary.
There are examples, here and there, of persons and groups who espouse no
religion. But, overall, history bears eloquent testimony to the human
capacity, indeed the human need, for spiritual experiences. It is common to
call human beings homo sapiens, that is, "creatures who think;"there is also
good reason to call them homo religious, "creatures who are religious"
(Cunningham, et. al. 1995: 1). People, then, are incurably or inherently
religious, their religions universally involve spiritual experiences (Hopfe 1991:
7, 8).
Christians do not say they have discovered or invented the genius of
religion. Rather, they humbly confess that their unique claims are a gracious
disclosure of God through the Holy Spirit to human beings. The tenets of the
Christian religion are not western in origin. The first disciples were Jews.
Their convictions were merely what they had received and experienced as true
and real. Christians take no credit for themselves for the uniqueness of their
religion. Notwithstanding, they accept and advocate the following truths.
To believe, then, that all religions are alike -- emanating from the same
source and leading to the same destiny -- is a serious mistake. It is neither
historically nor biblically accurate. The revelation of God in the incarnate
Christ, an eternal redemption through the vicarious suffering of Jesus, and
the empty tomb are distinctly Christian. No matter how much of value --
whether ethical precepts, social cohesion, or elements of truth -- may be found
or ascribed to non-Christian religions, there is a significant otherness to the
Gospel. The latter is simply incomparable. Christianity has been and will
remain a "nonmixer" (Hammer 1962: 91). It possesses an inherent "discontinuity"
(Kraemer 1956: 351). It allows no peer, tolerates no partnership among
religions. It is the absolute, complete, perfect, universal faith "once for all"
delivered unto the saints, Jude 3.
A. Jesus is the Lord of all History. The universe and all that is in it
was created by the Lord, John 1: 3; Colossians 1: 16, 17; Hebrews 1: 2. He is
the King of kings on whom all depends and in whom all authority resides,
Matthew 28: 18; Romans 14: 9; I Corinthians 12: 3; Philippians 2: 9-11;
Revelation 19: 11-16. As such, Jesus Christ is the ultimate source, hope,
purpose, meaning, and destiny of everything and everyone. To these
statements, Christians give hearty consent; but, to say "nothing happens
beyond or outside His sphere of influence," requires the surrender of two
pivotal doctrines of the Christian faith.
RELIGIOUS PLURALISM AND CHRISTIAN MISSIONS
Ed Mathews
Abilene Christian University
Abilene, Texas
I. Some Searching Questions
II. Commonality Among Religions
A Christian who is accustomed to prayer cannot help recognizing
that the Muslim whom he sees praying is doing something similar.
And seeing a Hindu bow down before his god stirs the Christian
because he himself has learned to bow his head before the God who
appears to us in Jesus Christ. Indeed, we cannot deny that our
Christian faith and those other religions have something in common,
that there are certain similarities between them (1966: 13).
Such similarity goes far beyond prayer to include the symbolic process,
religious language, and sacramental regulations. To be sure, a host of
variations exist, but ritual practices of one sort or another are found in all
religions.
Within a wide range of variations, there is substantial commonality of
structure. For instance, all religions have functionaries -- ordained priests,
officiating personnel, or spiritual leaders. All religions have institutions --
sacrifices, holy days, pilgrimages, and sacred places. These elements are
buttressed by codes of conduct, in the form of written or unwritten ethical
rules, as well as systems of belief whether formulated or not, which determine
or at least influence the lifestyle of the devotees. The details are certainly
different but the basic structures are surprisingly similar.III. Unique Christian Claims
These unique claims prompt some challenging questions. Are not these
convictions detrimental to a harmonious relationship with non-Christian
religions? Can one be as forthright and confrontational as these claims
suggest? In a world which encourages unity, tolerance, and peace, concern for
the brashness of these claims is obviously legitimate. It seems apparent,
nevertheless, that the Bible leaves no alternative: Christians should be as
closed as truth requires yet, at the same time, as kind as the Scripture bids
them to be.IV. Serious Contemporary Theories
Consequently, devotees of other religions are called "anonymous Christians"
(Rahner 1974) who worship the "unknown Christ" (Panikkar 1981) and belong
to the "latent church" (Tillich 1969). Though these positions represent
extreme views, they express widely held beliefs. From a human standpoint,
these two propositions appeal to the mind and heart. One could wish they
were true. Therefore, they deserve careful evaluation.
B. Jesus is Present in all Religions. The situation differs little when
the second proposition is considered, i.e., "since Jesus is everywhere, everyone
can find Him regardless of their religious affiliation, regardless of their failure
to recognize Him as Savior and Lord." The issue centers on the spiritual
experiences of the "men of faith" in other religions, such as Buddha,
Muhammad, Black Elk, or Mahatma Gandhi. They appear to have had
genuine encounters with what they perceived to be holy. Their experiences
were absorbing, ennobling, and transforming (like Christian conversion in
many respects). What is the source, nature, and significance of these
encounters? Where did they originate? Where do they lead? What do they
mean? Though they may reflect a common yearning of the human heart for
a connection with the ultimate, do they prepare mankind to accept the one
and only true God? The evidence of history does not allow an affirmative
verdict. Two facts must be emphasized.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Mirrored by permission of ACU Missions Personnel
Direct questions and comments to Ed Mathews,
![]()